Throughout our curriculum planning building week, we met with different NGOs in the Phnom Penh area. After meeting all the different NGOs, you can only feel great that there are so many people in the world that are still working hard to make their surroundings a better place. Since our the initial request from Transform Cambodia was to include Drug and Alcohol abuse and Domestic violence, our organisation Global Service Corps (GSC), had no resources or materials for those topics. So GSC set us up with two different NGOs that could help us gather and build information for the topics. In the eyes of GSC, meeting with other NGOs and collaborating with them is a great idea. Here’s why:
From the conversations we’ve had with other NGOs and with a consultant that helps organisations set up nonprofits in Cambodia, there’s two ways an origination can achieve nonprofit status in Cambodia. The first way, the most preferred way, is the bribe the various Cambodian governmental offices so that your application “doesn’t get lost”. After about a month, you have nonprofit status.
The second way is a very long process of building relationships with other NGOs and develop projects that you show to the different governmental offices demonstrating that you can handle nonprofit work in Cambodia. You will also have to deal with your application being lost between the different governmental offices which then you have to start the approval process over again. This route can take anywhere from several months to several years.
GSC decided to take the second route. Brit and I came in right when the organization is building relationships and developing programs in Cambodia. While it is exciting helping at a nonprofit start-up, it also helps put into perspective when people say “don’t go to a new medical school because they are still working out many problems and you will be the guinea pig”. There are a lot of GSC problems that we had to deal with while in Cambodia. I’ll write about those later.
At times I questioned why the hell are we meeting with a certain NGO. An inherent problem with GSC is that they specialize in short volunteer trips. This causes a problem when you’re trying build relationships with other NGOs. Most NGOs have established projects with long-term goals, so they do not want short volunteer workers. While 6 weeks such as our trip can be long for some people, in terms of NGO work, it is very short. In Cambodia there are not many other NGOs to work with because they want volunteers for several months. This leaves GSC with a smaller pool of partner NGOs. We worked with two NGOs to help build our curriculum.
One of the first NGOs we met with is and international organization called Friends-International

Friends-International is doing great things in Cambodia and they have developed an excellent marketing campaign that helps deter child sexual abuse. But because they’re so hands on, they had very little of their material to offer to us. What they were helpful on was giving us an insight into the Cambodian culture and how willing children are to seek help. Cambodian children will generally not seek help when there are problems in their house because they don’t want to project that there are problems in the household.
Our second NGO partner that we worked with was Khmer Youth Association (KYA). KYA is an interesting partner because I feel that they work on the same type of project that we were working on, HIV/AIDS prevention education, but yet different. Our approach to preventing HIV/AIDS was abstinence, but also ways to protect yourself when you chose to have sex. KYA, however, only focuses on abstinence.
Anyone with a brain knows that abstinence only education does not work. Just ask Sarah Palin.
At times during our meeting with the KYA Teen Reproductive unit was tense. At one point, one of their staff members yelled at us in broken English. Turns out that there was a communication problem between GSC and KYA. After much discussion between our group (without our executive director of GSC) and KYA, we decided to have KYA do a general health talk prior to our lectures.
If you followed any of my tweets on twitter, I expressed frustration about how the meetings were going. Because of communication problems between GSC and KYA, it put our team in a difficult position of figuring out how we can help each other. I feel we shouldn’t have been the ones figuring that out at the time. Our time was wasted and it took away from our curriculum building time. Organisation partnerships should be figured out prior to sending volunteers out. It also didn’t help that our executive director was in and out of these planning meetings.
I do feel we worked with KYA because they agreed to work with us. But because they have a different philosophy on how to teach HIV/AIDS prevention, it caused tension between KYA and GSC. KYA focuses on abstinence only education, they really were of no use to us when it came to talking about safe sex. We would ask if there was any program or teaching materials that they were willing to share for promoting safe sex and they out right said no and “because we only focus on abstinence education, we don’t believe in teaching anything outside of it”. At one point, they questioned why were working with our age group, and felt the material we were presenting was too mature. This tension boils down to different organisation philosophies and how to approach a problem.
This leads me to the final point:
It is important to build NGO relationships only if the organisation philosophies are aligned together.